Starting Point

  • Look at the Initial (Screening) Data
    • K-2
      • AIMSweb Universal Screening
      • Other data as identified by school
    • 3-5
      • EOG Scores (including Lexile & Quantile scores)
      • Universal Screening Data (if completed)
  • Group the students according to the data
    • First Grouping - See Intervention Focus Sheet & Breakdown Sheets
      • Reading
      • Math
      • Writing
      • Behavior
      • Academic
      • Language
      • Communication Difficulties
    • If possible, group students according to skills (such as the reading components, math domains, etc.) - See sheets with suggested steps for discussing data.
  • Review any existing plans
Intervention Focus

Reading Components

Math Domains

Written Expression Guide

Academic

Suggested Steps for Discussing School-Wide Data

Suggested Steps for Discussing Individual Class Data

Comprehensive Assessment of Need: Indicators of Evidence Based Practices/Programs

Reviewing Existing Plans

  • Start with the needs assessment
    • Does the needs assessment match the area of need identified
If Yes
If No
Review the progress monitoring data.
Determine if additional data is needed & complete a new needs assessment and adjust plan

Reviewing Progress Monitoring Data

Making Progress
None or Insignificant Progress
Continue interventions as written to the extent possible, making sure the intensity remains the same.
Determine if additional data is needed and adjust interventions

Adjusting Interventions

  • See sample adjustments
Sample Adjustments


IMPORTANT NOTE: When increasing the intensity you should first consider how the student is being taught. Decreasing a group size or increasing the amount of time a student is being taught a skill is not a successful approach if the instructional method is inappropriate for the student.

Determine if additional data is needed

  • Additional Available Data
    • WIDA scores (ESL students)
    • CogAT (taken in 3rd grade)
    • EC Data
    • Previous Report Card Grades
    • Other Diagnostic Data
Look at Comprehensive Assessment Plan & The Multi-Tiered Assessment Model


Finalize Plan

  • Update plan or create new plan
  • Review plan with parent
  • Begin implementation

When to Develop a PEP (or Start Tier I/RtI)

  • When you recognize that a student is either struggling to learn the core curriculum or having difficulty maintaining appropriate behavior in the general education classroom.
  • When the student did not make a Level III or Level IV on the EOG.
Suggested Guidelines for Getting Started


Importance of the plan

  • Provides targeted academic support/assistance to students who need it.
  • Documents the school/teachers efforts to support students who are functioning below grade level

View the following PowerPoints to determine what plan to use when:

Plan
PPT
Forms
Directions
Example(s)
Standard Protocol

Tier I
including
page 6






Student on Grade Level


See PowerPoint
N/A
EC Student



N/A
Individual PEP/Tier I


See PowerPoint
N/A

Go to wiki page and click on the ChathamCountyRtI wiki to get copies of all forms for all tiers.

Intervention Plan

  • Be sure interventions match the design criteria
  • Recommended timeframe
    • Six Weeks
    • Nine Weeks
    • Twelve Weeks
    • Be sure to consider holidays when writing the dates

Progress Monitoring

  • Progress monitoring needs to take place at least once a month.
    • Caution: Be sure whatever is used as a probe (data instrument) can be administered once a month.
  • Attach documentation
  • Can create own sheet, as long as all information present. (See running record example)
Running Record Example

CBM Assessment Areas

ABCs of CBM Summary

Periodic Evaluation

  • Must be completed at least once during each grading period.
  • Includes:
    • Summary of progress
    • Decision-Making
    • Signed by the principal or principal designee

Decision Making

Use the Implementation and Evidence Questions when making decisions for Tier I & II.

Implementation
  • Did the delivery of interventions follow the plan for implementation with accuracy and consistency?
  • Is progress monitoring of the intervention used and adjustments made as needed?
  • Did the intervention match the student's specific need?
If the answer is “no” to any of the above questions, you must first make adjustments to the plan before considering moving the student up a Tier II.

Evidence
  • Does the instruction or the intervention decrease the student's learning gap (learning rate)?
  • Does the intervention reduce the problem behavior and/or increase the desired behavior?
  • Does progress monitoring data determine the intervention to be effective?
  • Does student performance improved as measured by assessment(s)?
Examples

Activities at Tier II


Steps of cyclical problem-solving repeat, but more school personnel are involved as needed:
  • Parent
  • Teacher
  • Counselor, school psychologist, reading teacher, administrator, social worker, nurse, etc.

To help through the first (and possibly the second), Tier II will be done with the RtI team.

The intensity of the interventions increase.

Before Team Meeting


Teacher meets with assigned PLC group to discuss the following:
  1. What has been done at Tier I (PEP) and the student's response?
  2. Has the correct need been identified or whether other underlying causes need to be investigated?
  3. Should student be referred to the RtI team or adjustments made to interventions at Tier I?

If student is going to be referred to the RtI team, a review of the PEP for completion and accuracy needs to be completed by the case manager.

See Case Manager's Description on the Team Page

Teacher Preparation for the Meeting

  • Description of major concerns and how the student's difficulties interfere with the student's performance.
  • Gain any pertinent data from parents, including their concerns.
  • Description of student's strengths, as well as any incentives that motivate the student
  • Description of what has been done to assist the student
  • Data that indicates the student's current level of performance

What is the Task?

  • Review Tier I and determine if problem was accurate
    • If not, redefined the problem
  • Review Tier I and determine if analysis is accurate
    • If not, complete
  • Baseline
    • Obtain levels from the last progress monitoring and nay levels needed depending on the progress monitoring instrument you are going to use
  • Benchmark
    • Identify a new benchmark
  • Goal
    • Write a new goal using the new benchmark
  • Interventions
    • Identify how they will be adjusted (see sample adjustments)
  • Timeframe
    • Give a new timeframe

Where to Begin?

  1. Gather preliminary information
  2. Review Data
  3. Target Teacher Concerns
  4. Develop Intervention Plan
  5. Finalize Plan
See Team Protocol (Tier II and/or FIL) with Possible Questions to Guide Discussion on the Team Page

Standard Protocol Student

On Tier I, student was participating in the school-wide intervention program and was not making sufficient progress.
  • If the interventions provided in the school-wide intervention program meet the design guidelines for Tier I and the student is not making progress, you may proceed to Tier II.
  • If the interventions provided in the school-wide intervention program do not meet the design guidelines for Tier I and the student is not making progress, yo must first make adjustments to Tier I before proceeding to Tier II.

Another Area is of Concern

On Tier I, student's math difficulties were thought to be due to his reading difficulties, but he continues to struggle with both.
  • Student moves to Tier II for both areas
    • In addition to reading interventions, math interventions need to be added.

Making the move from Tier II to Testing (or Tier III), you use the same reflective questions to guide the decision making as going from Tier I to Tier II.


Additional Things to Complete Before Testing

  • Social Development History
  • Multiple Classroom Observations
    • Recommend that at least one observation take place during the intervention
  • Speech/Language Screening